Bible Code Revelations - Thematic Patterns Expose Riddles

Have you ever read the Bible and observed how excessively repetitious some passages seem? Sometimes, a thing is said over and over again, even in a very obvious way. Certainly, repeating a thing is a way to emphasize it, but there's actually more to it than that - much more! In a way that has escaped the notice of most of us, the Author has encoded His Word through the patterns of repeating words and themes. This phenemonon begins in the very first verse of the book of Genesis and extends all the way through to the end of the book of Revelation. This clever encryption methodology survives the translation of the original languages! Scholars refer to this facet of the scriptures as Chiasm, Chaismus, Parallelism, and Hebrew Poetry.

This is not for those who like to be "fed through a straw," so to speak, but for those who are skilled with a fork and knife. A student's diligent effort in seeking the Author's help in the analysis of these thematic patterns may result in added insight, even the unlocking of profound mysteries through the Author's own invaluable guide to interpretation. Think about this for a moment. Context is necessary to interpret and understand most everything in life. This is really is all about context.

...con·text n. 1. The part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning...

I didn't discover this underlying structure. It's been studied by some for a long time. Why haven't you ever heard of such a thing? Renowned scholar E.W. Bullinger pondered this, making the following observation in his work titled, The Scope of a Passage May Best Be Discovered by Its Structure.

“While the successive works of Bishops Lowth and Jebb were enthusiastically and generally received, yet the works of Thomas Boys not only had to fight their way through much opposition, but are now practically unknown to Biblical students. Whether it is because they afford such a wonderful evidence of the supernatural and miraculous in the Bible, and such a proof of the Divine Authorship of the Word of God, that they are therefore the special object of attack by the enemies of that Word (both Satanic and human) He alone knows. But so it is.”

I have no doubt that what he rightly considers evidence and proof is still today practically unknown to Biblical students because it is as he suggested, “the special object of attack by the enemies of that Word.” Acknowledging the greater purposes of the sovereign God, whose purposes are surely being served, the perceived lack of appropriate recognition is a witness to the Lord's own protection of the matter. I worked in the information security world where such a thing has been described as “security through obscurity” or “security by obscurity.” This practice isn't recommended as the only line of defense, but there's no doubt that hiding a thing provides a degree of protection. The Divine author has encrypted riddles and their answers in such a way that their very existence escapes the notice of the vast majority of those who come to the Bible!

Bullinger provides many examples of structure in his Companion Bible, and when I was introduced to this work in 1980 or '81 I found them fascinating and inspiring. At one point, I inquired of my former teachers about what they were for and was told that they were interesting but that they were not useful for interpretation. I tried to accept that answer out of respect, but really, that just never set right with me. Some time later, when the Lord took me to His feet for some reeducation, which was sorely needed, I discovered that structural analysis was actually an essential in His personal curriculum for me.

Since the time of John Jebb and Thomas Boys, others have published works in this genre like Nils Lund in the 1920s. In 2014 I discovered the website of Thomas B. Clarke, author of Joshua's Spiritual Warfare: Understanding the Chiasms of Joshua. We've met together a few times to discuss mutual interests. He makes some observations you may find useful on and on his blog. He writes: “The chiastic structure will change the way you read the Bible by unlocking Biblical meanings that are often not readily apparent.” He notes that, since the 1980's, there has been an increasing interest in the chiastic approach, and that one of the most comprehensive reviews of this writing style was prepared in 1999 by Dr. David Dorsey.

Here on The Open Scroll, there are many unique presentations of this kind. These are interactive, where you can use mouse-over gestures to highlight the matching elements and click or tap to access context-specific commentary. Here's an example of an interactive presentation, of Genesis 1:14-18.

More than 25 interactive presentations may be found in this growing collection: Interactive Presentations of Thematic Structures. They range in scale from the very small to the very large, with multiple chapters strung together in examples from the Old and New Testaments, in English, Greek and Hebrew.

Many of the matching elements in these thematic structures are pretty easily compared. For those pairings where the common theme is not so readily apparent, we can still be confident in knowing they are truly paired because of the symmetry of the context. The more obvious comparisons help guide us to the more subtle. If you're saying, “I don't get it,” perhaps you can enlist the aid of some friends who enjoy a good puzzle. Once we can confidently identify paired elements and agree that they are divinely matched, we have learned something very important about the context. One element is divinely paired with another, and together they bear witness on a common theme. If the mating doesn't make sense to you on one level of understanding, the relationship will be found to exist on another, which is often a deeper, more profound level of truth. We're drawn in by this curiosity, by the Lord Himself, to discover His secrets.

It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter.

Proverbs 25:2

To illustrate the importance of context, consider this simple example. If we're having a conversation and I tell you, “It's blue,” what have you just learned? Not much. What is it that is blue? I haven't explained what “it” is, so you can only guess. If our conversation was all about my new coat, it would be obvious what was meant. I could have said, “My new coat is blue,” but if we're having a conversation about it I can simply make reference with a pronoun and pretty safely assume that you'll infer from the context what's meant. When I communicate by making such a reference I'm making an implication. “It's blue” is not going to refer to something foreign to the context of our conversation. If you've got a sound mind, you're not going to reach outside that context for the meaning.

If the topic of our conversation has more than one level of meaning, like is frequently the case in the Bible, the matter being referenced may be esoteric, but that still quite fairly defines the context. The Lord has concealed essential information about the context from the casual reader by requiring that the thematic structure is properly discerned, and further, that deeper insight into the subject matter has been acquired. When the refined context is exposed through much effort and seeking of the Lord, we gain the advantage of learning precisely which pond must be fished, so to speak.

I think of this like as if I was fishing. If I'm fishing in a bass pond, I'm going to catch bass. I'm not going to catch trout. When it comes to most of what passes for sound Bible teaching, folks have long been accustomed to all manner of theological sleight of hand, where all manner of strange fish are pulled out of random ponds for lack of respect for the context established by the Author Himself, and, truly, for the Author Himself.

To say that this matter of context has been underemployed by students of the Bible as a guide to interpretation would be a massive understatement. No one who gives it their attention can deny that these patterns exist. No one exercising the least bit of common sense would see these patterns and suggest they have no use as a guide, because meaning exists within the framework of context. Thematic structure defines the context, does it not? To ignore it, then, when one seeks to learn the Truth, is foolishness, to the extreme, yet, that's what the church has done by failing to give it due respect.

Are scholars ignorant of this exhibit of the handiwork of the divine Author? No. Can all the blame for our ignorance be laid upon a few men? No, quite honestly. How many copies of the Companion Bible are in circulation, each of which bears witness to this structure throughout? In our readings of the scriptures, has it never been impressed upon you that there might be some purpose to the repetitions beyond the superficial impartation of a sense of prose?

15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.

2 Peter 3:15-16

Again, more than 25 interactive presentations may be found here: Interactive Presentations of Thematic Structures I highly recommend becoming familiar with them, meditating upon these patterns as the Lord may lead.


For some of the larger scale presentations, smaller screen sizes and resolutions present some challenges to getting the most benefit. Because the obvious solution is to increase the screen size, using a large monitor in portrait mode (rotated so it is taller than it is wide) is recommended, like this 24 inch monitor that can be rotated 90 degrees. A 27 incher or a vertical stack of thin bezel monitors would be even better, or a HD projector and giant screen like those found in many churches, corporate conference rooms and lecture halls. Most browsers can display in full-screen mode. Try F11.

Opening the presentation in two browser windows can help when the entire presentation doesn't fit within your screen height. With separate windows, the hover highlighting in one won't influence the other, of course, but that's not an obstacle if you're clever. (zoom out - will often allow you to discover the mouseover highlited pairing) The windows could be arranged side by side but it might be even more useful to go with an over-under arrangement. Scroll and zoom each until everything you want to compare is nicely in view. I recommend using two different kinds of browsers for these windows, like Chrome and Opera for example. This way, you can resize the text in one window independently of the other. The keyboard shortcut F11 will make browsers like Chrome and Opera toggle in and out of full screen mode, which makes the tabs, address bars and button bars come and go. Other useful keyboard commands are for refreshing (F5) and zooming (ctrl-plus and ctrl-minus - To return to default size: ctrl-zero).

In closing, on a similar line, here's a comparison between John 13 and Revelation 13 and 14 - Comparing Thirty-Eight Verse Pairs

I pray that you will find inspiration to seek the Lord about what He might have for you in this, in this hour of the age that is now, oh, so late.